Categories
Background Checks Human Resources Miscellany Online Dating Industry Relationships Romance Uncategorized

An Idiot Identity Thief Thinks He’s Brad Pitt

We saw this not long ago on MSN.

Forged ID: Brad Pitt’s Photo, Arabic Name
Jun 29, 10:57 AM EST

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — A Jordanian salesman who tried to use an identity card with Brad Pitt‘s photo was on trial in the Emirates, a newspaper reported Thursday.The 29-year-old salesman allegedly forged the card with the Hollywood actor’s picture and an Arabic name in an attempt to steal more than $22,000 left unclaimed at an exchange house where his brother worked as a teller, according to a report in the daily Gulf News.

The man, who told police he did not know who Brad Pitt was, said in court Wednesday that he downloaded the photo from the Internet, the newspaper reported. Police were reportedly alerted by an informant.

Dubai’s public prosecutors charged the man with forgery and embezzlement. A spokesman for the prosecutor’s office was not immediately able to comment on the trial.

Okay, so this guy is even more of an imbecile than your average imbecile. But not all identity thieves are this stupid. Not all identity thieves try to pass themselves off as Brad Pitt. The smarter identity thieves try to pass them off as someone like…well..you. The not only snatch your photo, but they can grab your more vitali information as well, including your social security number. And that opens the door to a whole lot of things, none of them pleasant for you.

You could be spending years trying to untangle yourself from identity theft. It could mess up your credit for a long, long time and in many ways ruin your good name and reputation. To protect yourself run your Social Security Trace in your name. For a few bucks the SSN Trace will tell you if there is someone else’s name attached to your own Social Security Number. The Social Security Trace is a short and easy step for long term peace of mind.

Categories
Background Checks Online Dating Industry Relationships Romance Uncategorized

Online Dating: Buying A Shot Of Love

We found this stat chart referring to the decline of Online Dating from the Center for Media Research

Cheap Dates Takes On a New Meaning

A January 2006 JupiterResearch consumer survey found that 5% of Internet users paid for online dating subscriptions in the last year, down slightly from 6% in 2005. Industry-wide user conversion rates fell for the first time since JupiterResearch began tracking that metric. According to an “Online Dating” report by JupiterResearch Analyst Nate Elliott, industry growth in the last twelve months has been driven by higher monthly fees rather than an increasing number of subscribers.

Elliott said “…thirty seven percent of visitors who don’t convert say dating sites cost too much, making it their leading complaint. Only one-third of Internet users who went to dating sites in the last year became paying subscribers.”

The JupiterResearch report also concludes that social networking sites pose little threat to the online dating industry. Just 14% of dating site visitors who don’t pay for subscriptions say they use free sites, like social networks, for online dating instead.

Everything hits a bad patch, and online dating has registered a significant decline. Since the figures are down from 6% of online subscribers using online dating systems, to now only 5% percent resorting to online dating, there is close to a 17% decline in online dating members.

The decline is more than likely the result of trashed expectations or severe disappointments. After shelling out cash for an online dating members, no ones wants to discover there is not much doing on the radar screen. We didn’t buy in to end up sitting alone on weekends eating too much ice cream in front of the television. Or worse yet, we end up out in a bar doing the same-same scene with your horny friends.

So you joined some dating site and you spent your bucks courting dreamboat of the cyberworld, only to discover when they are up close and personal they are more like the Gila Monster from Hell than any dream you had since childhood. But then what did you expect? Did you really think online dating was somehow removed and therefore different than life? Did you buy all that hype about soul mates, compatability tests and harmonic relationships being the cure to all your missed opportunities? Maybe. Maybe you should hang in there and go another month with an online dating membership. Or say forget it and check out the Starbucks for someone who looks interesting.

Among other things, we always found it odd that so many online dating sites, could claim to arrange the perfect match while neglecting something as basic but as essential as background checks. While we don’t believe online dating background checks should be legislated by the states, we do believe the self governing responsiblity of a respectable online dating site should be to at least offer if not mandate a background checks for every member.

Because at the end of the day whether you are online, offline or wallowing in your solitude, finding a mate is one of life’s more complicated obstacles. There is no magic bullet. You are either a lucky person who backs into the best relationship of their lives, or you work at it. If you are good at meeting people in life, then you are probably good at finding them on line. It’s life, just plain old ordinary luck of the draw take your best shot life, and that’s how it works on most occasions.

So forget all the statistics. Sometimes they work in our favor, and sometimes they are too daunting to contemplate. Just enjoy yourself, whether your are online or offline. And if you do meet someone either in reality or the cyberworld, be smart enough to run a background check and make sure they are really who they say they are. It’s by no means the total answer, but it is a good start.

Categories
Background Checks Miscellany Online Dating Industry Relationships Romance Uncategorized

Ralph Ginzburg, Art Magzine Publisher Ahead of His Time But Behind the Eight Ball

Usually we write about background checks and online dating background screening but for personal reasons when we saw this article in the New York Times, among many other publications, we felt we had to comment.

July 7, 2006

Ralph Ginzburg, 76, Publisher in Obscenity Case, Dies

Ralph Ginzburg, a taboo-busting editor and publisher who helped set off the sexual revolution in the 1960’s with Eros magazine and was imprisoned for sending it through the United States mail in a case decided by the Supreme Court, died yesterday in the Riverdale section of the Bronx. He was 76.

The cause was multiple myeloma, a cancer of the bones, said Shoshana Ginzburg, his wife and collaborator of 49 years.

First published in 1962, Eros was a stunningly designed hardcover “magbook” devoted to eroticism. While Playboy and other men’s magazines of the time catered mostly to male fantasies, Eros (named for the Greek god of love and desire) covered a wide swath of sexuality in history, politics, art and literature. Mr. Ginzburg valued good writing, and his contributors included Nat Hentoff, Arthur Herzog and Albert Ellis.

Eros also challenged the taboo of interracial love in a photo essay by Ralph M. Hattersley Jr. and published a previously suppressed portfolio of nude photographs of Marilyn Monroe, taken by Bert Stern.

Mr. Ginzburg’s eventual conviction on the obscenity charge hinged not on the content of his publications but on their promotion. The Supreme Court held that if “the purveyor’s sole emphasis is on the sexually provocative aspects of his publications,” that could justify a finding of obscenity for content that might otherwise be marginally acceptable.

Born in Brooklyn on Oct. 28, 1929, to immigrant parents from Russia, Mr. Ginzburg studied to be an accountant until his professor at City College encouraged him to accept an editorial job on the school newspaper, The Daily Ticker. With a passion for journalism, he took a job after graduation as advertising and promotion director at Look magazine and later became articles editor at Esquire.

Mr. Ginzburg soon found he had a talent for the mail-order business, especially writing attention-grabbing promotional advertisements. He wed his business and publishing instincts to social activism.

His first self-published book was “100 Years of Lynching,” a compilation of newspaper accounts that exposed American racism. Later he published “An Unhurried View of Erotica,” about the secret caches of erotic material in some of the world’s most famous libraries.

Eros, which was sold only through the mail, was conceived in a hardcover rather than a softcover format as a marketing ploy to extract a hefty cover price. Mr. Ginzburg hired the leading mainstream advertising typographer/art director, Herb Lubalin, to create innovative layouts for Eros. It cost him a lot of money to produce and never rose out of the red.

When the fourth and final issue appeared (a fifth was prepared but never published), Mr. Ginzburg was indicted on charges of violating a federal statute that regulated obscene advertising. His publications (Eros; Liaison, a biweekly newsletter; and “The Housewife’s Handbook on Selective Promiscuity”) were deemed obscene “in the context of their production, sale and attendant publicity.” After various appeals, the case was argued before the Supreme Court in 1965, and in 1966 Mr. Ginzburg’s conviction was upheld.

Despite protests by First Amendment advocates, he served eight months in a federal prison in 1972 after the Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal of his sentence.

His book “Castrated: My Eight Months in Prison” (a short version of which was published in The New York Times Magazine) was dedicated to his wife and collaborator.

As to why Eros was considered obscene, Mr. Ginzburg wrote in the book, it was a mystery to him. ” ‘Obscenity’ or ‘pornography’ is a crime without definition or victim,” he said. “It is a bag of smoke used to conceal one’s own dislikes with regard to aspects of sex.”

The Eros case was just one of Mr. Ginzburg’s famous run-ins with the courts. In 1964 another of his iconoclastic magazines, Fact, a political journal with a muckracking bent (and the first to publish Ralph Nader when he was a Harvard student), published a special issue on the “Mind of Barry Goldwater” when Senator Goldwater was the Republican presidential candidate that year, claiming that he was psychologically unfit for the office. Goldwater successfully sued him for defamation all the way to the Supreme Court; Justices Hugo L. Black and William O. Douglas dissented, citing issues of free speech. For Goldwater, it was a Pyrrhic victory; he received only $1 in damages.

From 1968 to 1971 Mr. Ginzburg also published Avant Garde, an art and culture magazine designed by Mr. Lubalin, whose logo for the magazine was the basis for one of the most popular typefaces of the era. Although Avant Garde included erotic material (an entire issue was devoted to John Lennon’s erotic lithographs), this time the focus was more on radical politics, including the “No More War” poster competition.

Mr. Ginzburg shut down the magazine when he started serving his sentence. Afterward, he and his wife tried to revive it as a tabloid newspaper, but it lasted only one issue.

It was a costly mistake that drove them to the brink of bankruptcy, which was averted only through the success of yet another periodical, the consumer adviser Moneysworth, which attained a circulation of 2.4 million.

At 55 Mr. Ginzburg retired from publishing to be a photojournalist, selling his very first photograph to The New York Post. He remained there as a freelance spot-news photographer until his death and specialized in New York scenes and sporting events, covering soccer as recently as three weeks ago.

In 1999 Eric Nash in The New York Times Book Review described his book of photographs, “I Shot New York,” as a heartfelt portrait of the extraordinary diversity of daily life in the city, and of New Yorkers’ love of bread and circuses.”

In addition to his wife, Mr. Ginzburg is survived by a son, Shepherd, of Ventura, Calif.; two daughters, Bonnie Erbe Leckar of Falls Church, Va., and Lark Kuthta of Hewitt, N.J.; and three grandchildren.

Despite Mr. Ginzburg’s ability to transform his life at critical periods, he saw his conviction and imprisonment as a handicap since, at the time, few establishment organizations would do business with him.

“Thus my publishing potential after release from prison was severely circumscribed,” he said. “I have always felt that I might have become a major force in American publishing had it not been for my conviction. Instead, I’m just a curious footnote.”

We worked for this guy as our first New York job. Sometimes you don’t know the influence someone can have on you, until years after. Ralph wore baggy pants with suspenders and the kind of funky sneakers you find in a bin at some closeout shop on 14th Street. A total character  whose subscribers would often send expletive filled, insulting postcards, after Ralph would prevail upon them to renew their subscriptions for the next twenty years. That was our job, reading the correspondence.

But above all else, Ralph was a total whiz at promotion, and as his history reveals he promoted himself often to the point of no return. But at Avant Garde, our magazine, he did more to showcase contemporary, edgy and to that point relatively unknown European and American Art than anyone else around. George Tooker, Tom Wesselman were but a few of the Americans, and Wunderlich and Hundterwasser, Hans Bellmer were but a few of the Europeans, as well as Picasso’s erotic drawings.

But as he says it himself, Ralph will always be known for the obscenity case and Eros Magazine.

Adios, Ralph.


Categories
Background Checks Human Resources Miscellany Uncategorized

We Have Outsourced a Drug Habit–Cocaine Abuse in India

We saw this article on the AP feed–

Cocaine May Be New Status Symbol in India

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Filed at 10:20 a.m. ET

NEW DELHI (AP) — What may have begun with a couple of snorts has fast become a media-driven blizzard over whether, along with German cars and French handbags, another Western import is sweeping India — cocaine.

Call it the full-on yuppification of India’s latte-swilling set.

”It’s all linked with purchasing power,” said Kiran Bedi, a police official who runs a drug treatment center. ”Cocaine is expensive. You’ve got to have money for it, and now more people have money. It becomes a matter of keeping up with the Joneses.”

It’s natural to see many Indian trends through the prism of the country’s economic boom, and this story is no different. Exposed in increasing numbers to clothes, music and mores of the West, some well-off Indians have, perhaps inevitably, picked up its less savory habits.

That’s clear on any given weekend at New Delhi’s trendy clubs and bars — places with velvet ropes and steep cover charges — where drugs are readily on offer, and, occasionally, openly in use.

A twenty-something banker at an elite New Delhi country club says that when he lived in New York it was common to snort a line or two of cocaine. ”Now I’m back here … and so are a lot of other people,” he said. ”But we’re still living like we did in New York.”

He asked not to be named for fear of India’s stiff anti-drug laws and ”my mother-in-law.”

Only a tiny percentage of Indians are believed to have tried the drug. It costs upward of $100 a gram and more than 40 percent of the country’s billion people live on less than a dollar a day. A bigger problem is heroin, on sale dirt-cheap in much of India, and thought responsible for an AIDS crisis in the country’s northeast among those who inject the drug.

Still, there’s ample anecdotal evidence that cocaine is growing more popular among the affluent.

There has been a string of busts over the past months, including one at Olive, an upscale New Delhi eatery, and the arrest of a Nigerian alleged dealer in the capital last month.

But those arrests were small-time — mere grams — compared with the seizure three weeks ago of 440 pounds of cocaine, India’s largest bust, aboard a ship at a container depot outside Bombay.

Then there’s the hospitalization of the scion of a prominent political family for overdosing on what appears to have been a mixture of cocaine and heroin.

In the hands of the Indian media, the plight of Rahul Mahajan has become a cautionary tale for a potentially wayward generation — and an excuse to introduce readers to the mechanics and effects of cocaine consumption.

”The usual method for cocaine intake is sniffing, smoking or injecting,” one daily, The Hindu, revealed to its readers. The Times of India reported that cocaine ”makes one euphoric and enhances sexual prowess.”

The Hindustan Times went even further, linking the drug to bisexuality. ”India’s power-packed beautiful people are ‘doing it”’ — bisexuality, that is — ”just to add value to the cocaine snorts and tequila shots” at parties, the paper said.

With police rounding up alleged pushers, some of the more visible partygoers in town are scrambling to make sure their dealers aren’t yet on the authorities’ radar, the banker said.

Police say foreigners make up the core of the trafficking and distribution network in India, but acknowledge that Indians are involved too. The cocaine, all from South America, arrives by courier on airplanes or ships such as the one caught near Bombay, which police say came from Ecuador.

India’s economy has grown 8.1 percent on average over each of the past three years. The boom has given tens of millions of people disposable incomes for the first time and is estimated to have more than doubled to 50,000 the number of households with incomes above $225,000.

The new money has helped foster a Western-style urban consumer culture that in turn has loosened many conservative traditions. One hit Bollywood movie last year was about an unmarried couple living together, a phenomenon almost unheard of here.

Cocaine too was also relatively unheard of until recently.

A woman who does public relations for fashion designers, and who asked not to be named for fear of upsetting clients, said there used to be one dealer in New Delhi. ”Now there are dozens.”

It is no secret that India supplies some of the better minds to American industry, especially with regard to science and technology. The Indian contribution to our collective brain power is quite considerable and its fair to say that both nations have benefited from the exchange of personnel. While it is arguable that outsourcing has been as good for the American workforce as it has for our multi-nationals, there is no doubt that this trend is by no means on the downturn.

The article states clearly that only a small minority of Indians are using cocaine or heroin, or cocaine and heroin together, which in the eighties was affectionately referred to as “chasing the dragon.” Of course, those who chased the dragon often ended up in fiancial or professional ruin, divorced and dead. Cocaine itself is not exactly the healthiest drug, which can impact health insurance rates. Cocaine often elicits tendenacies toward violence, sexual eccentricity and erratic behavior.

On it’s own, it can be argued this is the individual’s business. But in the workplace, the business and the ensuing liability factors are yours, the employer. The considerations are endless, from downturns in productivity to the increase in violence. There should be concerns for the theft of client lists and, moreso, the illegal sale of your intellectual propriety. People strung out on drugs are vulernable to predators who can profit from the theft and sale of such material to your competition.

The success India presently enjoys had not gone unnoticed by drug smugglers. It is only natural that they will prey on the successful, creating the kind of cachet where cocaine use is hip and cool as the article attests. This notion has apparently resonated with certain wealthier and, presumably more successful and more educated Indians. It certainly worked here in the eighties and cocaine use in the U.S. is on the rise again. Ultimately, with prolonged cocaine and heroin use, a considerable work ethic can erode to grievous levels. Substance abusers can endanger your business. They can create liability issues and malfeasance in the workplace. It might be one of your most reliable employees who though well intended contributes more to the destruction rather than the enhancement of your business.

As with all business models today, the same old isn’t the same old for long. Successful employers must adjust and instruct their Human Resource Managers to modify their pre-employment screening measures. Even though it is a tad more expensive, conducting background checks on foreign employees should be standard practice. Today with modern information retrieval systems, you can conduct international criminal background checks, education verification, and employment verifications. You may want to consider drug tests as well.

It’s your business, and the upfront costs of background testing are small compared to liability and damage factors. So always remember to check them out before your hired.